Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views

The discussion found in the comments below arose from a tip in the Debategraph - Open Office Hours map.

This tip, titled "A cluttered view may be a clue to look for more underlying structure", says this:

When an idea has many children – i.e. lots ideas arising from it – this is often a sign that there's a clearer and more efficient / compressed way of structuring the ideas to be found. If a particular view starts to feel cluttered, start looking for different ways to group or organize the ideas.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
DebateGraph Community
Development Ideas
Improving existing features?
Idea types and relationships?
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")
Argument structuring could be improved
Clarify the use of argument groups
Moves may create type inconsistencies
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (6)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip