Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack

The chances of a military strike against Iran in 2011 are receding because of the success of a joint Israeli-US cyberattack on the country's nuclear facilities, according to officials and analysts with knowledge of the clandestine operation. Possibly, sanctions are working too.

An official told the Guardian that the military option is now less likely, citing not only the cyberattack, but also the synchronised assassination last year of two Iranian nuclear scientists, attributed to Israel.

A leading analyst, Avner Cohen, the Washington-based author of Israel and the Bomb and Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb, also told this newspaper: "In the short term, it surely makes military action less likely. In fact, I do not see any military action against Iran anytime soon. It takes the pressure off. It does not mean military action is off the table, but it is not a short-term concern."
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
How should the international community respond?
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack
Degree of international support for a military attack on Iran?
Legal bases for use of force under international law?
Delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons
Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary
Consequences will be severe
If WAR is the answer, we are asking the WRONG question
May strengthen the regime internally (public opinion)
Military strike will encourage pursuit of nuclear weapons
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip