The Multiple Realisability Defence

It's not possible to formulate rules for connectionist representations (or representation instantiation rules), because such representations can be realised by multiple node level descriptions.

A representation of dog, for example, can be realised in a variety of different (though similar) node-level activation patterns.

Thus, no single node-level description can fully describe the dog representation.

Moreover, node-level discrepancies make it possible for the dog representation to produce a variety of different behaviours.


RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
Connectionist networks can think without following rules
Representations without rules
The Syntactic Argument
The Multiple Realisability Defence
Variable outputs can be described by rules
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip