comments

Will result to relatively little waste

NPP operation makes lots of waste. [NPP makes lots of waste that are not directly visible because for reactor cooling is used water from rivers or lakes. This process damages ecosystem. Moreover, the huge amount of radiation is emitted to air €LT

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Climate change and EU
⌃
Energy discussions and policies
⌃
Aggregated Energy Debate
⌃
Renewable forms of energy. Which is more convenient?
⌃
Conventional forms of energy
⌃
Nuclear energy
⌃
Nuclear plant in Lithuania
⌃
Lithuania needs a nuclear factory
■
Will result to relatively little waste
□
NPP construction is expensive but cheap exploitation
□
Safety issues
□
Country prosperity is impossible without energy ingrastructure
□
Dependence on energy from foreign countries will be reduced
□
It is a long term investment
□
It will be useful for the expansion of electric cars
□
it will ensure energy stability
□
Necessary, as Baltic countries will face power shortages
□
Will enable the country to sell energy
□
will guarantee cheap energy and fair electricity prices
□
yes, but only as a national object
□
Country prosperity is impossible without energy infrastructure
□
Expensive constuction and time-consuming
□
NPP is not worth the huge investment
□
Nuclear fuel could be purchased from the stable countries
□
Other, safer alternative energy sources exist
□
Specialists are needed for constuction and more taxes
□
There are ready investments for nuclear energy
□
Will further pollute the environment
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip