comments

Physical analysis suggests costs of sequestration are too great

Most of the physical analysis of net energy gain show that the cost (in energy) of sequestering would be too great. [awaiting citation]

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
What should Obama do next?
⌃
Science, Technology and the Internet
⌃
Science and Public Policy?
⌃
Science should play a stronger role in US policy development.
⌃
Is the curent team assembled by Obama up to the job?
⌃
Yes, Obama's team has the requisite experience
⌃
Inexperience indicated by naivité on alternative energy
⌃
Obama's support for "Clean coal" illustrates scientific naivité
■
Physical analysis suggests costs of sequestration are too great
□
Support for Clean Coal was just campaign politics
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip