Conditional optimism

The internet will favor democracy and free expression, provided democratic governments and other actors are forthright and vigilant in defending these values in the digital domain.



Alec Ross video slice from 8:00 to 9:55 of the original video.

Ross contextualizes the debate about internet freedom as part of a very long effort with ancient roots to secure the values of free expression and democracy. He points to efforts by states - including but not restricted to the usual suspects like China and Iran - to limit the free flow of information by making the internet function more like a collection of intranets, with the ability to control information flows across the boundaries.

Though in the course of this debate he does not explicitly take a position on whether the internet will be a net benefit to freedom and democracy, a general optimism coupled with a need for vigilance can be inferred from Hillary Clinton's speech on internet openness made on 30 January 2010 which Ross was apparently instrumental in drafting (click Citations below for the relevant excerpt). The speech includes words indicating that the tide of history favors open societies. In the map this position is treated as a variant of the unqualified optimism expressed by Schmidt (see Variation cross-link connecting the two positions).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Technology: Oppressor or liberator?
Does the internet favor dictators or dissenters?
Conditional optimism
Legitimacy of intervention
Tide of history
Alec Ross
Optimistic view
Pessimistic view
Protagonists in the seeding debate
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (1)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip