Hysterical intimidatory campaign against WikiLeaks

Secretary of State Clinton called it “terrorism,” despite the lack of death and destruction of property. It’s not a cyberwar attack, it’s embarrassment. Calling it terrorism is an insult to people who’ve suffered actual terrorist attacks

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
WikiLeaks
Reaction to WikiLeaks
Hysterical intimidatory campaign against WikiLeaks
Government and establishment media fear-mongering against WikiLeaks
18 Dec: Bank of America stops handling payments for Wikileaks
Dec 2, 2010: Amazon cuts off WikiLeaks
Dec 3, 2010: Library of Congress blocks access to Wikileaks website
Dec 4, 2010: PayPal Freezes WikiLeaks Account
Dec 6, 2010: MasterCard pulls plug on WikiLeaks payments
Dec 6, 2010: Swiss bank freezes Assange's legal defense fund
Intimidatory statements by US political figures
Jan 8, 2011: US judge orders Twitter to turn over Wikileaks accounts
People warned not to engage with the leaked material
Swedish charges against Julian Assange for sexual misconduct
Tom Flanagan: Julian Assange is a traitor and should be assassinated
US Air Force blocks media sites posting WikiLeaks (including NY Times)
Wikileaks has come under massive corporate attack to shut it down
Dec 16, 2010: Calls for restraint on prosecutions at Congress Hearing
Reactions to the conditions of detention of Bradley Manning
Reactions to WikiLeaks on other websites
Why are American journalists hesitant to speak up for Assange?
Counter-intimidatory campaign by supporters of WikiLeaks
Emergence of WikiLeaks clones
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip