comments

Computers embody programs; they don't obey them

Searle misinterprets what a program does. Computers don't obey programs the way the man in the room obeys a rule book. Computers embody programs. Similarly, a falling rock doesn't obey the law of gravity but embodies it.

David Cole, 1984.


RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
⌃
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
⌃
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
⌃
Man in Chinese Room doesn't instantiate a progam
■
Computers embody programs; they don't obey them
□
Implementations of programs must perform reliably
□
Computers and humans run programs differently
□
Proper instantiations require the right causal connections
□
Simulation requires duplication of functional interconnections
□
The proper algorithm is constitutive of thought
□
A properly designed Chinese room is Turing complete
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip