Computers and humans run programs differently

A man instantiating a chess program without knowing what he's doing is not playing chess: a computer doing the same thing is playing chess. It seems reasonable to suppose that the situation is similar in the case of speaking Chinese.

Thus, a man running thorugh the steps of a program without knowing what he's doing is not speaking Chinese: whereas a computer doing the same thing is speaking Chinese.

Richard Sharvy, 1983.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
Man in Chinese Room doesn't instantiate a progam
Computers and humans run programs differently
Implementations of programs must perform reliably
Computers embody programs; they don't obey them
Proper instantiations require the right causal connections
Simulation requires duplication of functional interconnections
The proper algorithm is constitutive of thought
A properly designed Chinese room is Turing complete
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip