Semantics may result from Godelian self-reference

The Chinese Room argument ignores the possibility of machines that can have semantics by virtue of self-reference. Godel's theorem shows how machines can encode their own syntax and thus reflect on their own programs.

Godelian self-reference provides a method to semantics that Searle has not come to grips with. If the Chinese Room implemented a semantics of this type it could be said to have intentionality.

Note: Also, see Map 7.

RJ Nelson, 1989.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
The Syntax-Semantics Barrier
Semantics may result from Godelian self-reference
Barrier's a problem for Searle's theory too
Notion of semantic hookup is problematic
Programs that learn can overcome the barrier
Searle's 3rd axiom requires scientific research
Syntax can generate natural meanings
The Empiricist Reply
The Luminous Room argument
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip