Notion of semantic hookup is problematic

Searle thinks semantics only arises when symbols are given meaning by being hooked up to the world. But many traditional puzzles show that merely syntactic use of language and symbols can generate linguistic competence with no semantic hookup.

Searle thinks that semantics only arises when symbols are given meaning by being hooked up to the world in an appropriate way. But this notion of semantic hookup, and Searle's notion of the meaningful symbol, is problematic. Many traditional puzzles show that merely syntactic use of language and symbols is enough to generate linguistic competence, even when there is no recognisable semantic hookup.

Richard Sharvy, 1983.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
The Syntax-Semantics Barrier
Notion of semantic hookup is problematic
Colour spectrum-inverting lenses
Linguistic semantics is only a matter of correlation of words
Musical Notation
People blind from birth use colour terms competently
Barrier's a problem for Searle's theory too
Programs that learn can overcome the barrier
Searle's 3rd axiom requires scientific research
Semantics may result from Godelian self-reference
Syntax can generate natural meanings
The Empiricist Reply
The Luminous Room argument
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip