Limitations of the Bubble focus view

The debategraph construct in outliner mode is fantastic. But the network view is very confusing because it is visually disruptive.

Since thought nodes are not anchored, the user cannot maintain a "breadcrumb" visual frame of reference as he follows a topic trail. Meandering through the What Should Obama Do trail gave me vertigo.

Better the flexible anchoring system of Compendium if you want a network representation of the dialog.  I.e. Anchored network that can be adjusted by a facilitator.

Also check out the deepamehta project.  They are explicitly working on an anchored node topic map construct for the purpose of visual continuity.

The new visualization tools are great.  But they invite overengineering.

Great job though on your efforts.  I think this is a terrific initiative.

Steve Mack
Washington, DC

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
DebateGraph Community
Development Ideas
Improving existing features?
Visualizations
Bubble Views
Limitations of the Bubble focus view
+ Hub view + Display menu options complement Focus view
1. Bubble Focus view is very narrow
2. After a few more moves from node to node, vertigo happens.
3. Node position varies in time
How to improve user control over the graph's appearance?
Bubble view should be as large as possible on user screen
Allow emphasis in the (short or long) description of a node
Breadcrumbs
Help the user keep track of where s/he is
Possibility to change branches colors
The possibility to add symbols or images in explorer view
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (1)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip