Searle never abandons locus of control

Searle never gives an example without some locus of control. In the Chinese Water Pipe there's a man controlling the faucets. In the Internalisation Reply a man remembers the books, baskets etc and manipulates the symbols in his head.

Dale Jacquette, 1989.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
Understanding arises from right causal powers
Brain's causal powers reproduced by a computer
Searle assumes a central locus of control
Chinese Room doesn't assume locus of control
Searle never abandons locus of control
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip