No: computers can't have free will

Machines only do what they have been designed to do and can't make voluntary, unconstrained decisions that are independent of the influence of deterministic factors. Hence, they lack free will and, therefore, can't think.

2

This view has been held by many since the conception of computing machines. Probably the first published claim of this sort is by Lady Lovelace, who is cited by Alan Turing, 1950, p. 449 and Douglas Hartree in their discussion of this issue in the 1950s. The source of the Lady Lovelace objection is provided in the source book page for box 17, "Computers only exhibit the free will of their programmers."

References

Turing, A. M. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, Vol. LIX, No. 236, Oct. 1950, pp. 433-460.

Hartree, Douglas. 1949.Calculating Instruments and Machines, New York.

Free will: The ability to make voluntary unconstrained decisions. Freely made decisions are independent of the influence of such deterministic factors as genetics (nature) and conditioning (nurture).

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't have free will
Computers can't do otherwise
Computers don't choose their own rules
Free will has infititude beyond deterministic limits
A determined machine can still have free will
Computers only exhibit the free will of programmers
Free will derives from multi-level structure
Free will is a decision-making process
Humans also lack free will
Random selection produces free will
No: computers can't be creative
Should the definition of thought be broadened?
No: computers are inherently disabled 
No: computers can't have emotions
No: computers can't reason scientifically
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
No: computers can't draw analogies
No: computers can't be creative
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
No: computers can't be persons
No: machines perform rather than understand maths
Yes: because a brain is a computer
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Yes: Existence entails Possibility
No: God gave souls to humans not machines
No: the implications too hard to face
Yes: The cellular processes of the brain can be simulated
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip