Chinese Room style argument shows causal powers insufficient

We can replace a relevant causal power in a Chinese speaker's brain—eg neurotransmitters—with a demon that simulates the causal power's function without understanding Chinese; hence having the right causal powers isn't sufficient for understanding.

John Haugeland, 1980.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
Understanding arises from right causal powers
Chinese Room style argument shows causal powers insufficient
Causal powers maintained if simulation low-level
Biological Naturalism
Brain's causal powers reproduced by a computer
Programming may be necessary to understanding
Searle commits fallacy of denying the antecedent
Sufficiency doesn't imply necessary powers
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip