comments

Searle attacks a straw man

No one in AI thinks successfully functioning programs must explain human understanding. Researchers see simulations as models of what human thinking might be about. Attributing strong AI to cognitive scientists without citation attacks a straw man.


Yorick Wilks, 1982.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
⌃
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
⌃
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
⌃
Chinese Room refutes strong AI not weak AI
■
Searle attacks a straw man
↳
Read what they've written
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip