comments

Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one

Japanese Room thought experiment is only supposed to make the epistemological point that a man in a room can't tell us wether the room as a whole is thinking. It's not supposed to make a metaphsical point about what can or can't have intentionality.

Richard Double, 1984.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
⌃
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
⌃
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
⌃
The Systems Reply
⌃
Man in room not in position to judge
⌃
In Double's account brains lack understanding
■
Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip