comments

The existence of the unexplained does not prove inexplicability.

Excluding the unknown is not the nature of science and what currently seems unreasonable is not necessarily ultimately unreasonable. The existence of the unexplained does not prove inexplicability.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Faith or Reason?
⌃
Is faith or reason better for acquiring knowledge?
⌃
Faith
⌃
Reason cannot completely grasp the human experience
■
The existence of the unexplained does not prove inexplicability.
□
Even if true, doesn't prove faith is the only tool to grasp it
□
How do you know that?
□
Not every glib one-liner is necessarily true
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip