explain how to use the Details pages of an Idea in DebateGraph as input for an analysis.

The Details pages of an Idea in DebateGraph can provide valuable input for analysis in a few key ways:

Idea Summary:
The Idea Summary field contains a concise description of the core argument or point being made. This can serve as a succinct starting point for understanding the essence of the Idea.
Analyzing the language and framing used in the Idea Summary can reveal insights about the perspective or bias underlying the argument.

Idea Description:
The Idea Description field typically contains a more in-depth explanation of the Idea, including the rationale, evidence, and counterarguments.
Closely examining the Idea Description can uncover the depth of reasoning, the breadth of considerations, and potential blind spots or gaps in the argument.

References and Citations:
Debategraph allows users to attach relevant references, studies, or other sources as citations to support an Idea.
Analyzing the quality, relevance, and diversity of these citations can provide insight into the strength and credibility of the evidence underlying the Idea.

Metadata:
Details like the Idea's creator, date of creation/last update, and the parent/child relationships to other Ideas in the DebateGraph structure can offer context about the origin, evolution, and positioning of the Idea within the broader discussion.

Collaborative Feedback:

DebateGraph facilitates user comments and discussions around specific Ideas, which can be analyzed to understand how the Idea has been received, challenged, or built upon by other participants.

Examining the tone, substance, and patterns of these interactions can reveal nuances about the Idea's persuasiveness and the areas of contention or agreement.

By closely examining the content and metadata available in the Idea's Details pages, analysts can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the argument being made, the evidence supporting it, the context surrounding it, and the community's engagement with it. This can inform deeper analysis, identification of key points of disagreement, and assessment of the overall strength and credibility of the Idea within the broader discussion.

The structured nature of DebateGraph makes it easier to systematically extract and analyze these various inputs, enabling more rigorous and insightful assessment of the ideas being debated.