comments

pros/cons vs supporters/detracters

One idea I had is to distinguish the following entity types:

- pros/cons - attached directly to options/ideas, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses

- supporters/detracters - a tree of claims attached to a pro or con, representing the debate about whether it is true or not

This makes the ontology bigger, increasing the learning curve, but it does think I distinguish between two logically differing map roles (evaluation vs arguments) and may thus reduce confusion overall.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
ESSENCE 2009 planning issues
⌃
How well is this tool working for us?
⌃
Expressing chains of Pros/Cons
■
pros/cons vs supporters/detracters
↳
Works well when the opposition is binary
↳
Multi-stakeholder, multi-perspective maps complicated
□
How do we handle chains of Pros/Cons?
□
Presumes tools are for direct "transcription"
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip