comments

Naming Israel in the declaration as a problem state

As things stand, there is no consensus on whether Israel should be named in the declaration as a problem state.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
NPT Review Conference – May 2010
⌃
NPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document
⌃
2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions
⌃
Points of contention around the final draft?
■
Naming Israel in the declaration as a problem state
↳
Egypt wants Israel identified as a problem state
↳
US is opposed to identifying Israel as a problem state
↳
US prepared to support a Mid-East WMD-free zone Conference in 2012
⇥
Israel's deliberate ambiguity over its nuclear policy
□
Specific timelines for disarmament
□
Treaty banning the use of nuclear weapons
□
Halt to the modernization of nuclear weapons
□
Negative security assurance
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip