comments

Negative security assurance

As things stand, there is no consensus on the inclusion of a "negative security assurance" – i.e. a pledge from the nuclear weapons states not to use nuclear weapons on states that don't possess nuclear weapons.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
NPT Review Conference – May 2010
⌃
NPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document
⌃
2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions
⌃
Points of contention around the final draft?
■
Negative security assurance
↳
Four of the P5 oppose the inclusion of a negative security assurance
□
Specific timelines for disarmament
□
Naming Israel in the declaration as a problem state
□
Treaty banning the use of nuclear weapons
□
Halt to the modernization of nuclear weapons
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip