comments

First, we need to believe it is possible.

The arguments here are mostly predicated on the assumption that disarmament is impossible. Nevertheless, we have reduced the number of weapons, and big voices like Kissinger are saying that full NW abolition is desirable. If he thinks that, then it is possible.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
⌃
Is full nuclear disarmament achievable?
■
First, we need to believe it is possible.
□
Logic of nuclear deterrence means that it must be abandoned
□
Second we need to understand that nuclear war is possible
□
Third, we need to understand that nuclear war would be global
□
Abolition of nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal
□
Disarmament is a realistic and achievable goal
□
Further proliferation of nuclear weapons is inevitable
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip