comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Nuclear weapons deter and limit military action
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
Nuclear challenges for the international community?☜What are the key challenges for the international community with respect to nuclear proliferation? And how can the international community respond effectively to those challenges?☜FFB597
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
Nuclear disarmament☜The international community needs to make progress towards the goal of nuclear disarmament—and, eventually, persuade all of the existing nuclear weapon states give up their weapons.☜59C6EF
⌃
Is full nuclear disarmament desirable?
Is full nuclear disarmament desirable?☜Is full nuclear disarmament a wise goal for the international community to pursue? ☜FFB597
⌃
Full nuclear disarmament is desirable
Full nuclear disarmament is desirable☜All nuclear weapons of all states should be eliminated.☜59C6EF
⌃
Nuclear weapons serve no useful purpose
Nuclear weapons serve no useful purpose☜☜98CE71
■
Nuclear weapons deter and limit military action
Nuclear weapons deter and limit military action ☜☜EF597B
↳
Nuclear weapons prevent escalation of conflicts into wars
Nuclear weapons prevent escalation of conflicts into wars☜☜98CE71
↳
Possession of nuclear weapons deters conventional attacks
Possession of nuclear weapons deters conventional attacks☜☜98CE71
↳
Possession of nuclear weapons deters nuclear attacks
Possession of nuclear weapons deters nuclear attacks☜☜98CE71
↳
Secure nuclear second-strike capability is the ultimative deterrent
Secure nuclear second-strike capability is the ultimative deterrent☜A secure nuclear second-strike capability is the ultimative deterrent. Therefore, they are uniquely suitable for defensive purposes.☜98CE71
↳
US allies continue to rely on US extended nuclear deterrence
US allies continue to rely on US extended nuclear deterrence☜Nuclear disarmament would leave American allies vulnerable to Russia, China, North Korea, or Iran. America can handle these threatening actors, but its allies continue to need the nuclear deterrent the United States extends to them.☜98CE71
□
Doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence is obsolete
Doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence is obsolete☜The end of the Cold War made the doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence obsolete.☜98CE71
□
Prompt Global Strike replaces previous nuclear-based alternatives
Prompt Global Strike replaces previous nuclear-based alternatives☜The need for a large nuclear stockpile and a first strike capabiltiy is being replaced by the Prompt Global Strike initiative.☜98CE71
□
Nuclear weapons prevent the use of nuclear weapons by others
Nuclear weapons prevent the use of nuclear weapons by others☜☜EF597B
□
Needed to destroy deeply buried, hardened targets in hostile states
Needed to destroy deeply buried, hardened targets in hostile states☜Nuclear weapons continute to be necessary to destroy deeply buried, hardened targets in hostile states.☜EF597B
□
Nuclear weapons necessary to deter and preempt further proliferation
Nuclear weapons necessary to deter and preempt further proliferation☜☜EF597B
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#57792
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
4/20/2010 4:34:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/20/2010 4:34:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload