comments

Existing nuclear weapons states don't want to disarm completely

While the existing nuclear weapons states may be happy to reduce their stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and are happy to espouse full disarmament as a long-term goal, they don't want to relinquish their nuclear weapons completely.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
⌃
Is full nuclear disarmament achievable?
⌃
Abolition of nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal
■
Existing nuclear weapons states don't want to disarm completely
↳
Nuclear weapons confer a strategic advantage
↳
Non state terrorism could rise despite NPT measures
↳
Nuclear weapons offer insurance against unknown future threats
↳
Non-NPT nuclear weapons states won't disarm completely
↳
NPT nuclear weapon states won't disarm completely
□
MAD is still central to America's nuclear standoff with Russia
□
Nuclear disarmament depends on achieving general disarmament
□
Nuclear disarmament will only occur when better weapons exist
□
Nuclear weapons can't be uninvented
□
Threat of dirty bombs remains while we use nuclear energy / materials
□
Human sacrifice used to be the norm, but we managed to get rid of it.
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip