comments

If it isn't broken, don't fix it

An ambiguous formulation of the role of nuclear weapons has worked well for 60 years. No need to change it.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
⌃
Potential nuclear disarmament steps?
⌃
Adopt a less aggressive nuclear weapons posture
⌃
All options should always be kept on the table
■
If it isn't broken, don't fix it
□
Ambiguity keeps enemies guessing
□
Don't make concessions without getting something in return
□
Only options that pass the test of morality should be kept
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip