All options should always be kept on the table

There is no need to disambiguate the role of nuclear weapons and to exclude their use from some particular scenarios. Explicitly listing such scenarios will only encourage enemies to enter those breaches.

"The U.S. has had a long-standing policy, embraced by administrations of both parties, of retaining all options to respond to an attack," Republican Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl said in a joint statement. "The NPR released today confuses this long-standing policy."

"The Obama Administration must clarify that we will take no option off the table to deter attacks against the American people and our allies," the senators said in a joint statement.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
Nuclear disarmament
Potential nuclear disarmament steps?
Adopt a less aggressive nuclear weapons posture
All options should always be kept on the table
Ambiguity keeps enemies guessing
Don't make concessions without getting something in return
If it isn't broken, don't fix it
Only options that pass the test of morality should be kept
Abandon doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on first strike
Lengthen time to deployment
Reduce the role of nuclear weapons in regional scenarios
Undertake not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (2)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip