comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Key objectives of US nuclear weapons policies and posture?
What are the key objectives of United States nuclear weapons policies and posture?
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Perspectives?
Perspectives?☜Use this area of the map to identify the key stakeholders in the policy process—and to cross-relate the stakeholders to the positions that they are advocating in the negotiations.☜D3B8AB
⌃
States
States☜14 nations currently host nuclear weapons, 30 countries generate atomic energy, and another 18 are building future reactors.☜D3B8AB
⌃
(1) States with civilian and military nuclear capability
(1) States with civilian and military nuclear capability☜Use this area of the map to explore the positions advocated by the states that possess both a civilian and military nuclear capabilty.☜D3B8AB
⌃
NPT members
NPT members☜☜D3B8AB
⌃
United States
United States☜The United States has both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜D3B8AB
⌃
US Nuclear Posture Review Report – April 2010
US Nuclear Posture Review Report – April 2010☜The 2010 NPR is a legislatively-mandated review that establishes US nuclear policy, strategy, capabilities and force posture for the next 5–10 years; providing a roadmap for President Obamas agenda for reducing nuclear risks to the US, its allies and partners, and the international community.☜FFB597
■
Key objectives of US nuclear weapons policies and posture?
Key objectives of US nuclear weapons policies and posture?☜What are the key objectives of United States nuclear weapons policies and posture?☜FFB597
↳
(1) Preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism
(1) Preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism☜For the first time, the NPR places preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism at the top of the U.S. nuclear agenda.☜FFB597
↳
(2) Reducing the role of nuclear weapons
(2) Reducing the role of nuclear weapons☜Updating declaratory policy to bring it into alignment with 21st century needs.☜FFB597
↳
(3) Maintaining strategic deterrence at reduced nuclear force levels
(3) Maintaining strategic deterrence at reduced nuclear force levels☜The NPR Report reflects the USs commitment to renew arms control and work with Russia to reduce nuclear forces while maintaining strategic stability.☜FFB597
↳
(4) Strengthening regional deterrence and reassurance of allies
(4) Strengthening regional deterrence and reassurance of allies☜The NPR reflects the Administration’s commitment to strengthening deterrence against 21st century threats to the United States, our allies, and partners.☜FFB597
↳
(5) Sustaining a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal
(5) Sustaining a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal☜The United States will sustain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal as long as nuclear weapons exist.☜FFB597
□
Part of wider strategy to signal US will follow its NPT obligations
Part of wider strategy to signal US will follow its NPT obligations☜The Nuclear Posture Review is part of an overall strategy to send a clear message that there will be a strong NPT, that everybody has an interest in being in the NPT, that the US is going to follow its obligations within the NPT.☜59C6EF
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#56244
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
4/6/2010 10:05:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/6/2010 10:05:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload