comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Abandon doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on first strike
Abandon the doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on the first use of nuclear weapons.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
Nuclear challenges for the international community?☜What are the key challenges for the international community with respect to nuclear proliferation? And how can the international community respond effectively to those challenges?☜FFB597
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
Nuclear disarmament☜The international community needs to make progress towards the goal of nuclear disarmament—and, eventually, persuade all of the existing nuclear weapon states give up their weapons.☜59C6EF
⌃
Potential nuclear disarmament steps?
Potential nuclear disarmament steps?☜What nuclear disarmament measures and steps might be taken?☜FFB597
⌃
Adopt a less aggressive nuclear weapons posture
Adopt a less aggressive nuclear weapons posture☜☜59C6EF
■
Abandon doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on first strike
Abandon doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on first strike☜Abandon the doctrines of nuclear deterrence based on the first use of nuclear weapons.☜9FDEF6
↳
Treaty on no-first-use of nuclear weapons against one another
Treaty on no-first-use of nuclear weapons against one another☜The nuclear-weapon states should negotiate and conclude a treaty on no-first-use of nuclear weapons against one another.☜9FDEF6
↳
Rapidly developing scenarios may require a nuclear first strike
Rapidly developing scenarios may require a nuclear first strike☜☜EF597B
⇥
China
China☜China has both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜FFFACD
⇥
India
India☜India has both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜FFFACD
□
Lengthen time to deployment
Lengthen time to deployment☜Changes should be made as soon as possible to ensure that, while remaining demonstrably survivable to a disarming first strike, nuclear forces are not instantly useable and that decision-making fuse for the launch of any nuclear weapons must be lengthened.☜9FDEF6
□
Reduce the role of nuclear weapons in regional scenarios
Reduce the role of nuclear weapons in regional scenarios ☜Devise a new regional deterrence architecture that enables a reduction of the role of nuclear weapons☜9FDEF6
□
Undertake not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states
Undertake not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states☜All nuclear-weapon states should undertake clearly and unconditionally not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones—and conclude a legally-binding international instrument on it.☜9FDEF6
□
All options should always be kept on the table
All options should always be kept on the table☜There is no need to disambiguate the role of nuclear weapons and to exclude their use from some particular scenarios. Explicitly listing such scenarios will only encourage enemies to enter those breaches.☜EF597B
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
July 2024
>
<<
July 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
27
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
29
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#55928
Node type:
Component
Entry date (GMT):
4/3/2010 8:19:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/8/2010 5:58:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
2
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload