comments

Abolition of nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
⌃
Is full nuclear disarmament achievable?
■
Abolition of nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal
↳
Existing nuclear weapons states don't want to disarm completely
↳
MAD is still central to America's nuclear standoff with Russia
↳
Nuclear disarmament depends on achieving general disarmament
↳
Nuclear disarmament will only occur when better weapons exist
↳
Nuclear weapons can't be uninvented
↳
Threat of dirty bombs remains while we use nuclear energy / materials
↳
Human sacrifice used to be the norm, but we managed to get rid of it.
⇤
Republican concerns about the New START Treaty?
⇤
Credible pursuit of full disarmament is desirable
□
Logic of nuclear deterrence means that it must be abandoned
□
First, we need to believe it is possible.
□
Second we need to understand that nuclear war is possible
□
Third, we need to understand that nuclear war would be global
□
Disarmament is a realistic and achievable goal
□
Further proliferation of nuclear weapons is inevitable
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip