comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Full nuclear disarmament is desirable
All nuclear weapons of all states should be eliminated.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
Nuclear challenges for the international community?☜What are the key challenges for the international community with respect to nuclear proliferation? And how can the international community respond effectively to those challenges?☜FFB597
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
Nuclear disarmament☜The international community needs to make progress towards the goal of nuclear disarmament—and, eventually, persuade all of the existing nuclear weapon states give up their weapons.☜59C6EF
⌃
Is full nuclear disarmament desirable?
Is full nuclear disarmament desirable?☜Is full nuclear disarmament a wise goal for the international community to pursue? ☜FFB597
■
Full nuclear disarmament is desirable
Full nuclear disarmament is desirable☜All nuclear weapons of all states should be eliminated.☜59C6EF
↳
Full nuclear disarmament is only desirable under certain conditions
Full nuclear disarmament is only desirable under certain conditions☜The total elimination of all nuclear weapons worldwide is a good idea only if a number of demanding conditions are met. When these conditions do not apply, full nuclear disarmament is not desirable.☜9FDEF6
↳
Non-proliferation Treaty predicated on progress to abolition
Non-proliferation Treaty predicated on progress to abolition☜The non-proliferation framework is predicated on the credible pursuit of disarmament by the existing nuclear-weapon states☜98CE71
↳
Reduces the risk that nuclear weapons will be used
Reduces the risk that nuclear weapons will be used☜Full disarmament eliminates—or, at the very least, significantly reduces—the risk that nuclear weapons will be used.☜98CE71
↳
Nuclear weapons serve no useful purpose
Nuclear weapons serve no useful purpose☜☜98CE71
↳
Probability of catastrophic use is greater than zero
Probability of catastrophic use is greater than zero☜If the consequences of the failure of a system would be infinitely destructive to a civilisation, it is reasonable for that civilisation to use that system if and only if the probability of its failure is zero. The chance of nuclear war is greater than zero. Therefore we must abolish these weapons.☜98CE71
↳
True security flows from cooperative humanitarian engagement
True security flows from cooperative humanitarian engagement☜True security flows from cooperative humanitarian engagement not nuclear deterrence.☜98CE71
↳
Full nuclear disarmament reinforces US conventional superiority
Full nuclear disarmament reinforces US conventional superiority☜Full nuclear disarmament means that American conventional predominance becomes more pronounced.☜EF597B
⇤
A NWC would would make the world safer
A NWC would would make the world safer☜Legislating against nuclear weapons would make the world a safer place.☜FFFACD
⇤
Grounds for progressive support for the New START Treaty?
Grounds for progressive support for the New START Treaty?☜☜FFFACD
⇤
Nuclear weapons raise the threshold for war, but not 100%
Nuclear weapons raise the threshold for war, but not 100%☜NW possesion raises the threshold for NW states to go to war, but the consequences of Nuclear War are so great that a 100% blocking threshold is required. Since this is not realistic, nuclear war is possible. Therefore the world would be safer if all nuclear weapons were eliminated.☜FFFACD
⇥
Eliminating all nuclear weapons would make the world less safe
Eliminating all nuclear weapons would make the world less safe☜The process and result of full nuclear disarmament makes for a world that is less stable than the current one.☜FFFACD
⇥
China
China☜China has both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜FFFACD
⇥
United Kingdom
United Kingdom☜The United Kingdom is one of the states that possesses both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜FFFACD
⇥
United States
United States☜The United States has both a civilian and military nuclear capability.☜FFFACD
□
Credible pursuit of full disarmament is desirable
Credible pursuit of full disarmament is desirable☜Whether or not full nuclear disarmament is desirable, espoused and credible pursuit of full disarmament by the existing nuclear weapons states is desirable.☜59C6EF
□
Full nuclear disarmament is undesirable
Full nuclear disarmament is undesirable☜The full elimination of all nuclear weapons is not a desirable goal.☜59C6EF
□
Further horizontal nuclear proliferation is desirable
Further horizontal nuclear proliferation is desirable☜☜59C6EF
□
Only partial nuclear disarmament is desirable
Only partial nuclear disarmament is desirable☜Rather than eliminating all nuclear weapons, existing stockpiles should be secured, and only reduced to an amount that still affords secure second-strike capability.☜59C6EF
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
1
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
5
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#55895
Node type:
Position
Entry date (GMT):
4/2/2010 10:57:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/19/2010 10:54:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
4
Outgoing cross-relations:
3
Average rating:
8
by
2
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload