comments

Can't legislate for security

One cannot legislate for security even in the domestic environment where a whole panoply of enforcement by the police and the courts exists.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Nuclear Politics
⌃
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
⌃
Nuclear disarmament
⌃
Potential nuclear disarmament steps?
⌃
Pursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention
■
Can't legislate for security
↳
Laws against murder don't prevent murders occurring
↳
Threat of, and from, a nuclear renegade will remain
⇤
A NWC would be counterproductive
□
States are legally obliged to negotiate a Nuclear Weapons Convention
□
Minimalist approach to disarmament has proven inadequate
□
Widespread, popular support for a Nuclear Weapons Convention
□
A NWC would would make the world safer
□
Pursuit of a NWC would draw the global community together
□
Similar conventions have successfully outlawed other WMD
□
Conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in place
□
Legislation prohibiting the use of nuclear weapons already exists
□
Pursuit of a NWC would hamper progress on other key treaties
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (2)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip