Trident replacement still under consideration

How can the UK claim to be committed to a world without nuclear weapons at the same time as renewing Trident?


In 2007, Parliament took the decision to begin the design work required to make possible a replacement for our ballistic missile submarine fleet to enable the UK to maintain a minimum nuclear deterrent beyond the life expectancy of the current submarines.

This decision is entirely consistent with our international obligations (the NPT does not prohibit recognised nuclear weapons states from maintaining and updating currently held systems) and our commitment to nuclear disarmament. It will not lead to an increase in the size of our arsenal, nor does it commit us irrevocably to possess nuclear weapons.

The Prime Minister has made it clear that as soon as it becomes useful to do so, the UK stands ready to include our nuclear arsenal in a future multilateral disarmament negotiation.

http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/global-issues/weapons/nuclear-weapons/nuclear-questions
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear challenges for the international community?
Nuclear disarmament
Is full nuclear disarmament achievable?
Disarmament is a realistic and achievable goal
Examples of progress on disarmament and nuclear posture?
UK progress on nuclear disarmament
Trident replacement still under consideration
Lengthened time to deploy UK nuclear weapons
UK has cut the explosive power of its total stockpile by 75%
UK has reduced its nuclear weapons delivery systems to just one
UK reduced operationally available warheads to fewer than 160
"New Chapter" envisages the use of nuclear force against terrorism
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip