comments

Thermostats can have beliefs

Beliefs can reasonably be ascribed to an entity when its actions are consistent, the result of observation, and in accordance with goals. Because the behaviour of thermostats meet those criteria, it is reasonable to say they have beliefs.

John McCarthy (1979).

Notes: These are the criteria for beleif ascription that McCarthy mentions in connection with the thermostat example. He discusses further conditions elsewhere.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Artificial Intelligence
⌃
Can computers think? [1]
⌃
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
■
Thermostats can have beliefs
□
Humans learn by adding symbolic data to knowledge base
□
SOAR (an implemented model)
□
The Biological Assumption
□
The Disembodied Mind Assumption
□
The Heuristic Search Assumption
□
The Knowledge Base Assumption
□
The language of thought
□
The Representationalist Assumption
□
The Rule-Following Assumption
□
The Symbolic Data Assumption
□
The Universal Conceptual Framework Assumption
□
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
□
AI programs are brittle
□
The critique of artificial reason
□
The Lighthill Report
□
Symbol systems can't think dialectically
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip