Explicit rules are unnecessary

Connectionist networks exhibit lawful behaviour without following explicit rules. Reguarlities emerge from the interactions of low-level processing units not from the application of high-level rules.

A network's behaviour may be characterizable by high level rules, but none are involved in its underlying mechanism.

David Rumelhart, James McClelland, & FARG 1986.

 

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Rule-Following Assumption
Explicit rules are unnecessary
Classicists aren't committed to explicit rules
David Rumelhart
James McClelland
All concepts are rules
Grammars are rule-based systems
AI rules can't explain ordinary language
Humans behave in orderly manner without rules
Impossible to write every rule
Programmed behaviour strictly rule-like or arbitrary
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip