comments

People may argue later that the cirteria used to rate was flawed

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Stirling Precinct 5 Workshops
⌃
What are the land use options for Precinct 5?
⌃
Retired land options?
⌃
Option 10: Walkway/cycleway
⌃
Sub options?
⌃
Option 10c: New laneway
⌃
Green links not well supported
⌃
The green link option does not adhere to the broader land use criteria
⌃
Issue?
⌃
The land use criteria are not suitable for assessing the green links
■
People may argue later that the cirteria used to rate was flawed
↳
Should specific criteria for this option be defined?
↳
What should the criteria be?
□
Criteria: Antisocial behaviour, amentity & resumption impacts
□
Green link option already discussed, with low community support
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip