comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Smacking children has bad consequences
Smacking children has bad consequences.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
Parental Force and Children
Parental Force and Children☜A map exploring the debate around the use of force by parents against children (following the amendment of New Zealand law in 2007 to remove the legal defence of reasonable force).☜F1CEB7
⌃
Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child?
Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child?☜Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child? ☜FFB597
⌃
No, not under any circumstances
No, not under any circumstances☜There are no circumstances in which it should be legal for parents to smack children.☜59C6EF
■
Smacking children has bad consequences
Smacking children has bad consequences☜Smacking children has bad consequences.☜98CE71
↳
A meta analysis of found that it is never O.K. to smack
A meta analysis of found that it is never O.K. to smack☜Childrens Commisioner quoted on TV interview [link?]☜98CE71
↳
High level of agreeement in research literature
High level of agreeement in research literature☜There is a high level of agrement in the research literature that physical punishment has been revealed to be a predictor of a wide range of negative developmental outcomes (see detailed text).☜98CE71
↳
Smacking can lead to permament pyschological harm
Smacking can lead to permament pyschological harm☜Some people making submissions to the parliamenary select committee told of developing psychological problems (eg self harm) which they believe were caused by physical discipline as a child.☜98CE71
↳
Smacking leads to child abuse
Smacking leads to child abuse☜Smacking leads to a culture of violence. [case sited by Sue Bradford] A parent who killed a child claimed he was disciplining him/her for soiling pants. ☜98CE71
↳
Smacking sets a bad example
Smacking sets a bad example☜Children learn from others (parents). Smacking teaches them that violence is the best way to solve problems with others.☜98CE71
↳
Dunedin research found no evidence for this
Dunedin research found no evidence for this☜A study of 1,000 children by the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit found that children who are smacked lightly with an open hand on the bottom, hand or leg do much the same in later life as those who are not smacked.☜EF597B
⇥
Physical punishment has negative outcomes
Physical punishment has negative outcomes☜Physical punishment has negative outcomes.☜FFFACD
□
NZ has obligations to the UN
NZ has obligations to the UN☜As a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, New Zealand is obliged to ban smacking.☜98CE71
□
There are better alternatives
There are better alternatives☜Nanny (TV show) never smacks or; many modern child care experts dont recommend smacking.☜98CE71
□
It legally creates inferior status citizens
It legally creates inferior status citizens☜In a society guided by Law, the usage of force is reserve to the justice system in order to coerce the citizens in abiding to the rules. All citizens are said to be equal facing the Law.The exception made for parents use of force on their children makes children lesser citizens.☜98CE71
□
Banning smacking will lead to ill-disciplined children
Banning smacking will lead to ill-disciplined children☜Physical punishment sends a message that bad actions have consequences to (the perpetrators) well being. ☜EF597B
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#5092
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
3/24/2008 11:55:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
3/24/2008 11:55:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
1
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload