Heuristic search is inconsistent with human phenomenology

Human experts play chess by "zeroing in" on relevant moves in fringe consiciousness rather than by iterating through a list of possiblities.

Hubert Dreyfus (1996).

Note: Dreyfus uses similar considerations to dispute machine translation, natural language understanding, and pattern recognition, which also require fringe consciousness and zeroing in.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Heuristic Search Assumption
Computers play expert chess using heuristic search
Heuristic search is inconsistent with human phenomenology
Humans see chess board as a Gestalt whole
Humans zero-in on information in fringe consciousness
Hubert Dreyfus
Deep Blue - Implemented Model
Deep heuristic search can achieve expert performance
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip