NamesH

"Benefit" type ; NamesT

NamesH is a Goal with increasing importance as "Big Data" proliferation occurs much more quickly than standardization does. 

This relatively large issue that can only be resolved through Experimental Development when independent software environments are interlinked. 

Additionally, the rate of accumulation grows as standardization increases.  Furthermore, growth is not homogenous.  As a result, effective Categorization demands periodic Experimental Development.

 

Furthermore, individual environments each introduce their own specific needs.  For example ...

  • DebateGraph's "cross-link and Search capabilities make it efficient to have searchSubStrings embedded in Idea Names.  This may not be strictly necessary.
    • Search strings likely need to be preceded by whiteSpace.
    • comparing 'ID' & 'IDent' suggests that search is still not fully understood.
      • one possibility is that an independent Keyword structure exists
      • this might explain some of the apparent latency for changes

 

'NamesT' is an initial attempt to meld static Time nameSyllables into Names in order to reduce maintenance.

EdDTqu,s is a protest of ...s(earch)

refine

 this into effective documentation of the NonWords concept

^

 


RELATED ARTICLESExplain
202?-Ð( 丑 )
→ TnT
RoadMap
? + *
⒈ Idea Type(s)
⓿ "Goal(s)"
🔝 進 = "Goal"
`㊿
dotCommands
TweTt = .we = -w47
今日
TweTn
汇 = (work)Flow
Productivity
NamesH
Knowledge
Π
ω(iki)
NamesH
SrEd2
Outliner
ώ
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip