ISEPP Petition on DSM-5

"This places professionals in an ethical double bind. In order to work with people who choose to use health insurance benefits, the professional must provide a DSM diagnosis; a diagnosis known to be invalid and potentially harmful. If, on the other hand, the professional refuses to diagnose in order to avoid the harm, and precluding insurance coverage, then the consumer may not be able to afford badly desired help."

ISEPP Calling for Organizations to Join in Petition / February, 2017

"In recognition of this ethical dilemma, ISEPP has drafted an open letter to four principal professional organizations in the United States, publicizing this concern and asking for ethical guidance. The draft of this letter is included below. ISEPP is soliciting other groups to join us in this letter."

*

Direct links to this page:

Outline View: dgraph.org/ISEPPpov

Page View (phones): dgraph.org/ISEPPppv

Or use Views menu.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
Moving Forward
How can we move forward?
Use the Moving Forward Matrix
Pursue Strategic Procedures
Promote Positive Change
ISEPP Petition on DSM-5
Allen Frances condemns DSM-5. 2013.
How to contact US politicians
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip