Abuse of Gillick precedent

Intended execptions to the Gillick precedent been distorted into a principle that anyone over 13 can consent to sharing sensitive personal information without the involvement of their parents.

"The Gillick precedent establishes that a child’s parents should normally be involved in matters of consent, but that, exceptionally, the child may exercise the consent function to the exclusion of the parent if he or she insists on it and has the maturity to understand the consequences. This has been routinely turned into a principle that anyone over 13 can consent to sharing sensitive personal information without the involvement of their parents."

Source: fipr Report, p.2.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Children's Databases
The case against the children's databases
Poor data protection and privacy track record
Abuse of Gillick precedent
Consent sometimes obtained coercively
Example of poor practice by police officers
Monitoring sexual activity of 16-18 year olds
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip