Neurons can't represent rules of ordinary language

AI assumes rules are ultimately represented in the brain. But neurons don't provide a symbolic medium in which rules can be inspected & modified, so they aren't appropriate as a medium for the formulation of rules for ordinary language.

We don't use neurons like we use rules.

Graham Button, Jeff Coulter, John R. E. Lee, and Wes Sharrock (1995).

Note: See also on this map:

  • the "Do humans use rules as physical symbol systems do?" arguments,
  • and the sidebar "Postulates of Ordinary Language" on this map.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Biological Assumption
Neurons can't represent rules of ordinary language
We do not know if neurons do or do not "provide a symbolic medium."
Brain has a von Neumann architecture
Neurons operate like logic gates
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip