The Objectivist account of cognition

Symbol structures are meaningful due to their correspondence with entities and categories in the world. They mirror nature "re-presenting" what exists in external reality. Without this connection to the world, they are meaningless.

As articulated by George Lakoff (1987).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Representationalist Assumption
The Objectivist account of cognition
Objectivism conflicts with natural human categories
Objectivist account of cognition is inconsistent
The Lowenheim-Skolem theoruem
The world is its own best representation
Front-end Assumption is dubious
The representational tradition is flawed
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip