Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny





RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny
Emails show stonewalling and doubts, but not that science was faked
Motives of FOI requests are highly questionable
Spec interests have $ to create uncertainty-influence political agenda
Hacked email refers to a "trick" to hide the decline
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
Hacked emails suggest desire to withhold data from publiic scrutiny
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip