comments

Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny





RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
⌃
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
■
Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny
↳
Emails show stonewalling and doubts, but not that science was faked
□
Motives of FOI requests are highly questionable
□
Spec interests have $ to create uncertainty-influence political agenda
□
Hacked email refers to a "trick" to hide the decline
□
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
□
Hacked emails suggest desire to withhold data from publiic scrutiny
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip