Past disappointments

AI workers have little more than past disappointments to their credit as the number of facts necessary to capture the entirety of common sense knowledge is insurmountably large.

James Lighthill, 1973.

Machine agents can only cope successfully in limited domains, such as the game of checkers, where a small number of facts exhaustively describe the agent's world. To scale up from such artificial worlds to the real world simply by adding more facts is not possible, because this leads to a combinatorial explosion of the number of ways in which elements can be grouped in a knowledge base.

Supported by "The Lighthill Report" Box 74.

Note: This argument summarizes a number of Lighthill's opinions, and it represents in early form versions of the problem of toy worlds, brittleness, combinatorial explosion, and commonsense knowledge, all of which are well known problems today.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Knowledge Base Assumption
The problem of commonsense knowledge
Past disappointments
Huge database may be sufficient for commonsense
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip