Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is

Phil Jones to Michael Mann: "I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
Peer-review process has been corrupted
Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report
Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is
Papers referred to in the email were cited in IPCC AR4 report
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip