comments

Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is

Phil Jones to Michael Mann: "I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
⌃
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
⌃
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
⌃
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
⌃
Peer-review process has been corrupted
⌃
Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report
■
Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is
□
Papers referred to in the email were cited in IPCC AR4 report
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip