comments

Response to publication by Climate Research of a dissenting paper

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
⌃
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
⌃
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
⌃
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
⌃
Peer-review process has been corrupted
■
Response to publication by Climate Research of a dissenting paper
↳
Climate Research published a dissenting article
↳
Encourage colleagues not to cite Climate Research papers
↳
Encourage colleagues not to submit papers to Climate Research
↳
Phil Jones demanded Climate Research rid itself of troublesome editor
↳
Suggest Climate Resaerch no longer a legitimate peer-reviewed journal
□
Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewers?
□
Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report
□
Response to Geographical Research Letters
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip