The Knowledge Base Assumption

Symbolic data can be organized into a knowledge base—written in a representation language and allowing computers to infer conclusions from available information. E.g. Chair: is made of Wood, is used for Sitting On. Wood: comes from Tree.


A knowledge base could be created that would reprsent the entirety of human understanding. However, when AI researchers develop knowledge bases, they generally focus on some particular domain, such as the domain of furniture, animals, restaurants and so forth.

Examples of representation languages include predicate calculus and the computer programming language LISP.

A knowledge base representing the domain of furniture should, for example, support the inference that a chair is something people sit on.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Knowledge Base Assumption
Combinatorial explosion of knowledge
Domain aggregation doesn't give commonsense
Creative discoveries restructure knowledge
Predicate calculus can't capture human reasoning
The frame problem
The problem of commonsense knowledge
Thermostats can have beliefs
Humans learn by adding symbolic data to knowledge base
SOAR (an implemented model)
The Biological Assumption
The Disembodied Mind Assumption
The Heuristic Search Assumption
The language of thought
The Representationalist Assumption
The Rule-Following Assumption
The Symbolic Data Assumption
The Universal Conceptual Framework Assumption
The Chinese Room Argument [4]
AI programs are brittle
The critique of artificial reason
The Lighthill Report
Symbol systems can't think dialectically
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip