comments

Flaws in process don't necessarily invalidate main findings

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
■
Flaws in process don't necessarily invalidate main findings
□
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
□
Reports redrafted under political pressure
□
Reluctance to release data / interpretations for independent review
□
Some areas of climate science may be too partisan, too centralized
□
IPCC process is sufficiently reliable
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip