No possibility of exclusion of any contrarian, peer-reviewed papers

"There is, therefore, no possibility of exclusion of any contrarian views, if they have been published in established journals or other publications which are peer reviewed."

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
IPCC report writing process is subject to extensive/repeated review
No possibility of exclusion of any contrarian, peer-reviewed papers
Certainty of observation is bureaucratic in character not scientific
Process eliminates omissions / distortions, intentional or accidental
Full opportunity for experts to draw attention to significant papers
Preparation of summary for policy makers provides further safeguard
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip