comments

No possibility of exclusion of any contrarian, peer-reviewed papers

"There is, therefore, no possibility of exclusion of any contrarian views, if they have been published in established journals or other publications which are peer reviewed."

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
Anthropogenic Climate Change
⌃
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
⌃
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
⌃
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
⌃
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
⌃
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
⌃
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
⌃
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
⌃
IPCC report writing process is subject to extensive/repeated review
■
No possibility of exclusion of any contrarian, peer-reviewed papers
↳
Certainty of observation is bureaucratic in character not scientific
↳
Process eliminates omissions / distortions, intentional or accidental
□
Full opportunity for experts to draw attention to significant papers
□
Preparation of summary for policy makers provides further safeguard
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip